Example: Outstanding Innovation in a Clinical Area

• Relevance: This criterion assesses how well the innovation addresses the need for a new or revised process, programme, or initiative in a clinical area. Judges will consider the alignment between the innovation and the identified need, evaluating how effectively it addresses challenges or gaps within the clinical setting.
• Effectiveness: This criterion evaluates the outcomes achieved through the innovation, focusing on its impact on quality, service, financial operations, and safety. Judges will assess the measurable results and improvements resulting from the implementation of the innovation, considering how it has positively affected these key areas.
• Innovation: This criterion examines the level of creativity and innovation demonstrated by the individual or team responsible for the innovation. Judges will evaluate the uniqueness and originality of the approach, considering how it breaks new ground, introduces novel ideas, or applies existing concepts in a fresh and innovative way.
• Transferability: This criterion assesses the potential for the innovation to be transferred, implemented, or applied to other departments or groups within the organisation. Judges will look for evidence of how the innovation can be shared, scaled, or adapted to different contexts, evaluating its potential for broader impact across the hospital or healthcare organisation.

These judging criteria will guide the assessment of nominations for the Outstanding Innovation in a Clinical Area award. By considering the relevance, effectiveness, innovation, and transferability of the nominated innovations, the judging panel will determine the most deserving recipients of this recognition.